Find the change. Organize the evidence. Define acceptance.
Work through the generated bridge example as a reviewer would. Compare two updates, assign missing-evidence requests, attach supporting files, and prepare an acceptance plan for your organization.
First visit? Follow one review from question to handoff. When you return, your local notes remain here. Your workflow status does not change the engine's findings.
Loading the recorded comparisons and evidence requests…
What moved between updates?
Inspect the complete comparison and relationship changes
These are recorded day-based engine calculations, matched by activity code. The schedule explorer shows exported fields, so its dates can differ. The complete source report's qualifications still apply. Movement is not proof of causation, responsibility or entitlement.
Download all six engine comparisons · Read the input qualifications
Ask for the evidence that matters.
The bars rank missing inputs by the number of clauses for which that input is the sole missing item. That means potentially decidable, not passing. Requests that need other inputs remain in the full worklist.
Files stay in this browser's local storage database; they are not uploaded. Maximum 5 MB per file and 20 MB per workspace. Attachments are preserved in the exported JSON package. “Reviewed” records your workflow status; it does not rerun or approve a clause.
Build your organization's acceptance plan.
For each check, record the agreed criterion, test owner and observed result. “Passed” is your recorded decision, not an automated certification. Do not use the sample benchmark as an acceptance threshold for your schedules.
Discuss this pilot with Charley ↗ · Export the package below and attach it to your email if you choose.
Keep a reviewable handoff.
Your notes, status choices, acceptance criteria and attachments are saved on this device when browser storage is available. The exported package also contains the recorded comparisons and evidence-request definitions for an offline handoff. Export before changing devices or clearing site data. This is a personal review workspace, not a shared team audit system.
Restoring replaces this browser's current workspace only after confirmation. Attachments are not opened or executed by this page. The package includes original sample-input identifiers and reviewer-entered information; it is not a signed or independently timestamped record.
A useful next step for your team
Start with an agreed set of representative schedules and a named reviewer. Decide which outputs matter, which differences are acceptable, and which questions must remain with a person. Use the exported plan to agree scope before deployment.
The next enterprise layer is shared review: controlled access, assignment history, evidence retention and approvals. Those require an organization-specific deployment and agreement; this public workspace does not claim to provide them.
Source: web/pages/review.md. Source commit date: 2026-09-10.